Neighbouring Websites

                  Steven Lehar

If you  like my trashing of Naive Realism but baulk at the world-view of Neutral Monism within which it is embedded (particularly with its 'religious' overtones), then move over to the site of 'fellow Hungarian' Steve Lehar.  We have hoed parallel rows over the dispatch of Naive Realism;  likewise, we both reside principally within the right lobe of the Cortex.   Steve feels more comfortable within a securist weltanschauung, as do most of those speculating on these momentous issues.  

It is no exaggeration to say that as a Gestalt psychologist et al, he is of the same caliber as Köhler, Wertheimer, and the other founding fathers of the movement.  I'm sure they would have been delighted to see the way he has brought their work into the 21st century

Each of us has proposed a formal substratum for the mind-brain relationship, both of which are field theories holisitcally inclined.  All of those theories current enjoying popular support are still-born.  In constrast one or both of what we are proposing just might ,  in the fullness of time, come to prove out;  a big 'if' but  where there's life there's hope  

 http://cns-alumni.bu.edu/~slehar/

 

http://cns-alumni.bu.edu/~slehar/Representationalism.html

         Mark Crooks 

            Crooks is the most active and vigorous of us in preserving forward a 'representative' epistemology.   See his:

Crooks M. (2002) Intertheoretic Identification and Mind-Brain Reductionism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 23(3).

 He is very thorough and reliable and by all accounts is making some headway.  He may be reached at:

crooksma@msu.edu

        Raymond Smythies

        Smythies has been at the game longer than the rest of us, and has seen some heady times, hobnobbing with the likes of Aldous Huxley and Arthur Köstler.  Less known to most are his contributions to neurophysiology and pharmacology.  The best single reference is:

The Walls of Plato's Cave: The Science and Philosophy of (Brain, Consciousness and Perception) by John R. Smythies

         The Kheper (and allied) websites

         There is a distinctly odd, but interesting group of chaps to be found at :

                                                                          http://www.kheper.net/

        Like a few of us 'down here' they are groping with and trying to make some sense of the more intangible aspects of reality that are studiously turned a blind eye to by mainstream intelligentsia.  To those who would dismiss them as undisciplined crackpots, I would only respond "be content;  they have the sparks,  all you have is the tinder".   Of particular interest to myself is their attempts to bring the -as yet- non-existent 'top-down' system of logic/mathrematics into some kind of focus.  

                     Raymond Tallis

         Tallis has probably done more than anyone to reinstate the domain of Consciousness in full strength and on its own terms.  A list of his publications may be found at

                                                http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/raymondtallis.html

          I have particularly in mind his:  "The Explicit Animal" where he tackles the whole matter with eloquence, wit and style. He has replaced the politically correct, peer-reviewable surface by a handsome domain that places the Mind stratum truly at the leading edge of the Mind/Brain ensemble.  However, be advised that though vast, the cavern of subjectivity and its agency is a closed one, hence placing it beyond reach of any domain of Transcendence from which alone its ultimate meaning and significance are to be sought and -hopefully- found.

 

            He may be reached at:  rtallis@fs1.ho.man.ac.uk

 

            Intelligent Design

 

            Common gumption compels the acknowledgement that intelligence of some sought is getting into evolution somewhere and somehow.   It takes no more than an elementary knowledge of probaboility theory, thermodynamics and biochemistry to demonstrate that The Mainstream demand belief -that neodarwinism  (based entirely upon an ongoing selection from mutations arising exclusively from quasi-randum natural processes) is provably false;  this is particularly true of life's origins.  However, it is a sad commentary upon the Mainstream mind set, that prior to such mainstrations thedefault position has not been taken that intelligence is afoot.  The whole matter is obfuscated by a false posing of the question -that we must choose between the two options of a theistic orthogenesis and  neoDarwinism. 

 

           However, though the theists seems hold stage center, the 'Intelligent design' website doles air alternative opinions aand views. It may be found at   http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/